[Grovenet] An-Inconvenient-Truth

[Eric Canon]

In this mornings paper there is an opinion piece
by Debra Saunders in which she challenges several
points from An-Inconvenient-Truth. It seems a
scientist with ties to Exxon-Mobil believes the
climate is sufficiently resistant that there will
be a natural correction to carbon dioxide levels
which are currently four times the levels seen in
the last 650,000 years. Gore's assertion that
science is 100% united is thus challenged by
Saunders, who offers no suggestion about response
to global warming. She just challenges Gore.
Here's the link to her piece:

http://tinyurl.com/mau2y

So Steven, assuming this movie is not the path
you would choose, what path do you suggest?
Perhaps there is one on which we can agree, and
thus move on to appropriate responses to the
situation.

--- Steven <NoSpam03 at comcast.net> wrote:

> Interesting that you can define all this from
> one's willingness to see a
> movie.
> And that our country could be polarized into
> the camps of folks who did or
> did not see a movie.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I expect it
> > is the same for people here on this list as
> well
> > who voted for Bush and have their needs met
> with
> > his "leadership". Tom, Lena, Robert, the two
> > Stevens, my guess is that they would never
> ever
> > consider seeing such a movie. (Correct me if
> I'm
> > wrong! If you have or are going to see the
> movie,
> > I owe you a humble apology, and I'll serve it
> up,
> > too.)
> >
> > It saddens me we are so polarized as a
> nation.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>