[Grovenet] A little more inconvenient truth . . .

[Phoenixacm at aol.com]

Hi, Eric, 

I did not imagine it as a group that had discussions.   I imagined it as a 
group that transformed discussion into action.   I did not have a very precise 
idea in mind because I wanted to be open to the needs of others.   I have not 
pushed for a precise agenda for such a group, simply inquired whether people 
were interested.   I expected that we would create our own options, based on 
what we felt we needed.   I belong to environmental organizations that I value.   
(The names of environmental organizations that we value might me something 
that we would share in our group, if the group wanted to.)   I had something 
more local and individual in mind.   

I am open to the option of doing it on Grovenet, but I had a more supportive 
environment in mind.

Jane B-P


> I may not understand you here Geri and David. If
> a group of folks wanted to have a discussion on
> such a topic as global warming, and form a
> definitive group to do that, where would such a
> group go? I'm unfamiliar with the options for
> such an endeavor.
> 
> Also, I was not anticipating that a group such as
> Jane described as using much space. There might
> be an initial flurry of posts, but my guess is
> that it would be well within the normal traffic
> we experience here now.
>