[Grovenet] A little more inconvenient truth . . .

[Eric Canon]

That sounds like great fun to me, except for the
time for the meeting part. I just hate to take on
anything else right now. Then again, if it were a
breakfast meeting "of minds", that might entice
me enough to kick in a good case of denial about
my schedule and sanity. I love a good breakfast
out!

Would anyone else be into that?

Eric (there's so much to do!) 

--- Phoenixacm at aol.com wrote:

> 
> Hi, Eric, 
> 
> I did not imagine it as a group that had
> discussions.   I imagined it as a 
> group that transformed discussion into action. 
>  I did not have a very precise 
> idea in mind because I wanted to be open to the
> needs of others.   I have not 
> pushed for a precise agenda for such a group,
> simply inquired whether people 
> were interested.   I expected that we would
> create our own options, based on 
> what we felt we needed.   I belong to
> environmental organizations that I value.   
> (The names of environmental organizations that
> we value might me something 
> that we would share in our group, if the group
> wanted to.)   I had something 
> more local and individual in mind.   
> 
> I am open to the option of doing it on
> Grovenet, but I had a more supportive 
> environment in mind.
> 
> Jane B-P
> 
> 
> > I may not understand you here Geri and David.
> If
> > a group of folks wanted to have a discussion
> on
> > such a topic as global warming, and form a
> > definitive group to do that, where would such
> a
> > group go? I'm unfamiliar with the options for
> > such an endeavor.
> > 
> > Also, I was not anticipating that a group
> such as
> > Jane described as using much space. There
> might
> > be an initial flurry of posts, but my guess
> is
> > that it would be well within the normal
> traffic
> > we experience here now.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>