[Grovenet] A little more inconvenient truth . . .

[Geri]

Again, I'm not saying it can't be done both ways --
Especially since it seems different folks feel differently
about how "supportive" GroveNet is ... or what the
definition of "support" is ...  which is what I thought
was the purpose of Jane's proposal.

Anyone who believes they get enough support on
GroveNet to do this shouldn't bother with an additional
group, I'd say!

:)

Geri

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Morelli" <jo.david at verizon.net>
To: "Forest Grove local interests list" <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] A little more inconvenient truth . . .


: 
: On Jun 22, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Geri wrote:
: 
: > Sorry, not understanding why you and David think that *I* think we  
: > can't talk about global warming on GNet while at the same time  
: > having a support group with Jane off GNet!!!!
: >
: > All I was saying is that there is a place for *support* off  
: > GroveNet, which anyone here has to admit is not a supportive place  
: > to *all.*
: >
: > Geri
: 
: Geri,
: 
: Funny thing.  I personally find Grovenet both stimulating and  
: supportive.  Where else can I say something and expect that someone  
: might actually pay some attention to what I said?  The fact that some  
: people disagree with me usually indicates that they actually took the  
: time to read what I wrote.  Like when members of a writer's group.
: 
: My observation is based upon a personal feeling that a 1% change in  
: 100 people has a larger long term effect than a 100% change in 1  
: person, because the 1% might lead to 2% over time, while the 100% is  
: maxed out and may be reduced over time.
: 
: And .... there are the lurkers.  They may benefit from the general  
: discussion.
: 
: David
: _______________________________________________
: GroveNet mailing list
: GroveNet at rdrop.com
: http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet