[Grovenet] political orators
Ed Davie
edavie at verizon.net
Mon Oct 2 14:46:20 PDT 2006
I LOVE those last two paragraphs!
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron D'Eau Claire
To: 'Forest Grove local interests list'
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] political orators
I really don't think JFK meant that statement
about asking what we can do
for our country as a military recruitment call,
but his administration did
several very onerous things to discourage
Americans who were already
committed to doing the best they could. I
believe it was some time later
that JFK decided we must support the Vietnam
insurgency to avoid the
elections that would certainly give control to
the Communists. Back then
people were paranoid about the Communist
movement through the far east.
My point was that many, many Americans were
already doing, not asking. It
wasn't encouraging when he lumped everyone into
the same "you're not doing
enough" pot. Still, his rhetorical skills
carried it off.
Fortunately, I was nearing the end of mandatory
Military service and never
had to go to Vietnam.
Contrast that with Secretary of Defense Robert
(Mack the Knife) McNamara. I
was working in a defense research facility when
suddenly we were called into
meetings required by McNamara. In those meetings
we were told the Secretary
would allow no further slacking and second-rate
work from us. To emphasize
it, if we wanted to keep our jobs we had to sign
an oath that we would
henceforth cease our slovenly ways and commit to
doing a first-rate job.
After signing the oath we were then awarded a
"Zero Defects" card.
As one sage put it in the meetings, "At least we
got the defects down to
only one in this country, but it's a huge one
sitting in the Defense
Secretary's office!"
I saw people fired on the spot for such
comments. "Mac" simply decreed that
any contractor not supporting the Dept of
Defense requirements to the letter
would be fined and perhaps lose their government
contracts. The companies
were simply middle-men who had to carry out the
Government rules about
individual behavior and beliefs without
question. And people shook their
heads over Mao's "cultural revolution" that
dictated what people in China
were supposed to think. It didn't work there or
here, fortunately.
The highlight of my "defense" work came for me a
few years later when I was
no longer willing to work on projects for more
efficient ways to dismantle
living human beings. Many of our projects were
top priority rush jobs, not
because they were needed by the troops in 'nam,
but because they wanted to
test them on real humans before the war stopped.
It's hard to find
volunteers to skewer, dismember or otherwise
kill. One wants an active war
for that sort of testing, and who knew when we'd
see another?
When I had enough of it and quit for a "civilian
job", the highlight of my
work there was walking into my boss' office,
handing him my resignation, and
setting fire to my "Zero Defects" card. I had
alerted a photographer friend
who was there to take a photo. Jay, my boss,
took it in good humor, not
feeling any more kindly to the Zero Defects
program than anyone else. I've
lost that picture over the years. Too bad. No
objector ever burned a draft
card with the same gusto as I set alight that
Zero Defects card.
In spite of the horrible war, JFK in his short
service did manage to build
national pride and instill an enthusiasm in the
nation that I've not seen
since. It's significant to me that LBJ, nor, if
memory serves me right,
President Nixon dismantled negative ideas like
that Zero Defects program.
That was too bad. Those programs were just
another step in creating an
unproductive "us-them" mentality that still
persists between too many of the
people of the USA and our government.
We've lost wars. We've suffered huge economic
setbacks as our money has
flowed out of our hands and into foreign powers.
We have lost our
manufacturing base, our educational base, and
our scientific leadership.
But, in spite of all those things, we've lost
something far more important,
I think. We've lost confidence in our own
government.
The old saying is true, a good reputation is
easy to lose and very tough to
build. That includes the reputation of
governments. Even ours.
Ron D'Eau Claire
-----Original Message-----
From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com
[mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com] On
Behalf Of JBlair2154 at aol.com
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 1:16 PM
To: grovenet at rdrop.com
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] political orators
In a message dated 10/2/2006 2:15:07 PM Central
Daylight Time,
grovenet-request at rdrop.com writes:
"...ask
not what your country can do for you: Ask what
you can do for your
country." I was thinking, "...just what else
does he expect?" I had no idea
that the "assistance" we were providing the
insurgency in Vietnam would
blossom into one of the most horrific wars and
one of the most horrific
defeats in our history.
And I had no idea that JFK meant those words as
a recruitment call for the
armed forces. Seriously. Maybe he did...at least
in part...but I've always
remembered it as a plea for Americans, in
general, to be less self-centered
and
more unselfish: to gripe less about being taxed
(as well, perhaps, about
the
draft) to serve as community volunteers, to view
political issues from a
broader standpoint than simply a personal one,
etc. Maybe the historians
among us
will offer more knowledgeable viewpoints than
mine. (Meanwhile, I'll
remember with a twinge of sadness the image of
Ron gripping his M1.)
I was glad to see the discussion about the
relevance of articulate or even
eloquent speakers among political leaders, past
and present. I firmly
believe
that GWB's "finest moment," -- indeed, his only
halfway GOOD moment, in my
opinion -- was his patriotic speech on the
rubble. That, more than anything
else, helped him get reelected. Reagan and
Clinton were both excellent
communicators, and perhaps the most popular
presidents in recent history.
Ergo: what
we Democrats MOST need as a presidential
candidate is someone who has not
only
the other credentials we value (and my list, at
least, is rather long) but
is also a powerfully persuasive public speaker.
Barack Obama comes to mind.
And I would like to thank Katie (I think it was)
who provided a link to
Obama's website, even though my browser wouldn't
accept the link. Her
suggestion
gave me the impetus to do a quick search and
find the site, where I
listened
to his speech about curtailing oil dependency,
then his "Call to Renewal"
address about religion and politics. Neither of
these speeches were as
well-rehearsed and dynamic as his Democratic
Convention keynote speech, of
course, but
very substantive and impressive, anyway. Enough
to make me startle my dogs
by clapping and yelling now and then. <G> And
enough to make me send the
link
to a former classmate who, although a devout
"born again" Christian, has
the
heart and mind of a true Democrat and thinks for
himself. And he, in turn,
had the courage to pass it along to that small
group of neoconservative
classmates with whom he is still in touch (and
from whom I am alienated)
and ask
them to read it. (I wish him luck!) Recently,
you see, he had received a
forwarded email from one of them which explained
why a Christian can't
possibly be a
Democrat. He had mentioned this to me and said
he had ignored it, but I
knew
it troubled him and I knew Obama's speech would
offer him solace. After a
recent heart attack, he has been instructed to
reduce stress in his life,
so of
course, he has been sidestepping such
provocative emails. His response to
Obama's speech was therefore a very meaningful
gesture. It says a lot about
him, AND about Obama.
So far, I haven't heard any party leaders
mention Obama as a potential 2008
candidate. But frankly, I'm beginning to feel
more and more strongly that
our
country needs him NOW.
Joy
_______________________________________________
GroveNet mailing list
GroveNet at rdrop.com
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
_______________________________________________
GroveNet mailing list
GroveNet at rdrop.com
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
More information about the GroveNet
mailing list