[Grovenet] America's Propaganda Quagmire
allnutt
allnutt at verizon.net
Thu Sep 7 13:16:24 PDT 2006
So true.
But the good news is that reality eventually starts blinking like a neon
sign.
When bush mentions how bad bin Laden is 12 times in a non political speech
people begin to wonder why bin Laden is a free man today.
When bush keeps saying our allies are working with us to help fight
terrorism and we won't be friendly to those who harbor terrorists people
start to wonder why the deafening silence on what happened over Waziristan
this weekend.
The only good thing about the propaganda quagmires is that if you are knee
deep in the stuff, it does harden and you can eventually walk out of it.
Katie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <rondec at easystreet.com>
To: "'Forest Grove local interests list'" <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 12:04 PM
Subject: [Grovenet] America's Propaganda Quagmire
> I've been following the President's so-called non-political speeches on
> his
> "War on Terror" that sound to me like political speeches supporting his
> party.
>
> Now I see that Congressman Conyers, in a recent e-mail announcement, has
> weighed in about the pending ABC special on 9/11:
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> ABC is planning to air a two-part mini-series entitled The Path to 9/11
> this
> Sunday and Monday.
>
> In spite of its claim to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report, the film
> reportedly includes numerous inaccuracies and lays the blame for the
> September 11 tragedy on the Clinton Administration. One scene reportedly
> depicts a senior Clinton Administration official calling off the capture
> or
> killing of Osama bin Laden. This depiction of events has been refuted by
> former Bush Administration anti-terrorism chief, Richard Clarke.
>
> It also has been reported that the film blames the intelligence breakdowns
> on bureaucratic obstacles allegedly created by the Clinton Administration,
> even though Republican 9/11 Commissioner Slade Gordon has previously
> refuted
> that claim.
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> True? Not true? Does anyone care? Considering our recent history at the
> polls, facts are about the least important concern to American voters. I
> say
> that honestly, recognizing that when people are sufficiently frightened or
> confused facts become the least of our concerns.
>
> In the meantime the propaganda quagmire gets deeper and deeper. As long as
> the propaganda is mixed in well with "news" or "political analysis" it
> becomes very difficult to recognize.
>
> Maybe impossible.
>
> Ron D'Eau Claire
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>
More information about the GroveNet
mailing list