[Grovenet] America's Propaganda Quagmire

[Steven]

The customers haven't seen it yet. If it is edited/clintonized, the
customers won't see it.
Unless the customers are the DNC?
Which is a possibility. With Hil a difinte contender in 2008, and choosing
the FCC board, ABC execs don't want to piss off the future government.

Don't get me wrong. I worked in the business. There was the rough cut,
director's cut and lawyer's cut. The network can do as they want. It is just
that in many cases like this, the right or left has used the 'C' word. I
don't see it in the media frenzie, yet.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com]On
> Behalf Of allnutt
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 7:23 AM
> To: Forest Grove local interests list
> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] America's Propaganda Quagmire
>
>
> Technically it is called listening to your customers. They aren't calling
> it
> censorship because that is when the government tells you what to print or
> not to print.
> In this case the government would prefer that the 'dramatization' be as
> made
> up as possible becauses the truth would be damaging to the current office
> holder.
> ABC is free to air it as is if they want they control their own
> programming.
> It is just that customers ultimately decide whether to watch it.
>
> Katie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven" <NoSpam03 at comcast.net>
> To: "Forest Grove local interests list" <grovenet at rdrop.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 6:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] America's Propaganda Quagmire
>
>
> > Hmm. No one is calling the re-edit of the program prior to air as
> > censorsship.
> >
> >> -------------------------------------
> >>
> >> ABC is planning to air a two-part mini-series entitled The Path to 9/11
> >> this
> >> Sunday and Monday.
> >>
> >> In spite of its claim to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report, the
> film
> >> reportedly includes numerous inaccuracies and lays the blame for the
> >> September 11 tragedy on the Clinton Administration.  One scene
> reportedly
> >> depicts a senior Clinton Administration official calling off the
> capture
> >> or
> >> killing of Osama bin Laden. This depiction of events has been refuted
> by
> >> former Bush Administration anti-terrorism chief, Richard Clarke.
> >>
> >> It also has been reported that the film blames the intelligence
> >> breakdowns
> >> on bureaucratic obstacles allegedly created by the Clinton
> >> Administration,
> >> even though Republican 9/11 Commissioner Slade Gordon has previously
> >> refuted
> >> that claim.
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------
> >>
> >> True? Not true? Does anyone care? Considering our recent history at the
> >> polls, facts are about the least important concern to American voters.
> I
> >> say
> >> that honestly, recognizing that when people are sufficiently frightened
> >> or
> >> confused facts become the least of our concerns.
> >>
> >> In the meantime the propaganda quagmire gets deeper and deeper. As long
> >> as
> >> the propaganda is mixed in well with "news" or "political analysis" it
> >> becomes very difficult to recognize.
> >>
> >> Maybe impossible.
> >>
> >> Ron D'Eau Claire
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> GroveNet mailing list
> >> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> >> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------
> >> Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo!
> Small
> >> Business.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> GroveNet mailing list
> >> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> >> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GroveNet mailing list
> > GroveNet at rdrop.com
> > http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>