[Grovenet] Select a Candidate 2008

Allen Warren osubuckeye59 at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 6 10:46:14 PST 2007


In all seriousness, as a lay person, I wouldn't even *BEGIN* to know how to be a successful President.  And if you think we got problems now, hoo BOY would we have problems with an experienced pup like myself attempting to be President.

Work with Congress?  Where would I begin?  Foreign Policy?  I'd be a stuttering idiot attempting to either talk with or apply diplomacy.

About the only thing I'd have going for me other than my honesty and having never accepted outside interest money is all you fine folks here on Grovenet providing thoughtful, knowledgeable and balanced advice.  And I say that with the utmost respect for all I read here on Grovenet.  All of you provide some of the most honest, passionate and varied discourse on a wide array of both domestic and world issues.

Hmmm . . . yet again another reason why it might be good for an ordinary person to run . . . 
 
Allen Warren


----- Original Message ----
From: Ron D'Eau Claire <ron at cobi.biz>
To: Forest Grove local interests list <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 10:02:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] Select a Candidate 2008

Heh, heh... Go for it! America might become the land of the people, by the
people and for the people yet! 

"Mr. Smith" might make it to Washington yet someday (ancient James Stewart
film known only to curmudgeons, James Stewart fans and students of the
silver screen, but one I think every American child ought to know). 

Back in the 1960's there was serious discussion in some circles that we
should not elect Congressmen and women, and perhaps not even Senators or the
President. Instead, ordinary American citizens would be drafted by lottery
to fill those jobs for a period of 2 to 4 years. It still sounds like a good
idea to me, at least for the House. The thinking was a lot like that about
the military draft. All dangerous, onerous and unsavory jobs ought to be
shared by all, including service in Washington. The result would be a
citizenry who has some understanding of what was going on in Washington and
compassion for the poor souls serving there.

Actually I mis-spoke (or mistyped): It's TWO-thirds of the voters, more than
2 out of three, who are;

1) Fed up with the Republicans

2) Fed up with the Democrats

3) Think our economy is going to crash.

That leaves, at best, 1/3 of the voters to carry the old time political
party banners into 2008. 

Ron D'Eau Claire 



-----Original Message-----
From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com] On
Behalf Of Allen Warren
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:00 AM
To: Forest Grove local interests list
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] Select a Candidate 2008


"The one thing angry, frustrated, worried voters are not likely to do is
make any sort of rational choice based on facts."

Hmmm . . . maybe my idea to declare as a candidate isn't so far-fetched
after all.  Hmmm . . . 
:-)

Allen Warren


_______________________________________________
GroveNet mailing list
GroveNet at rdrop.com
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the GroveNet mailing list