[Grovenet] ear mark this!

[Steven]

Baste-o dizer que eu posso concordar com o David e o Walter com esta edicao.
Contudo eu discordei em muitos topicos. Mas se voce nao pudesse compreender
que isto voce nunca saberia aquele, voce? Assim nao provando seu proprio
ponto.

-----Original Message-----
From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com]On
Behalf Of Jeff Howden
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 6:26 PM
To: 'Forest Grove local interests list'
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] ear mark this!


David,

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: David Morelli [mailto:jo.david at verizon.net]
>
> > We've made it over 200 years without an official
> > language.  What makes you think that having one now
> > will change anything?
> >
> > Personally, I see no reason for an official language.
>
> I would suggest that the laws that are written, and the
> decisions of our courts are easier to understand and
> (if it ever possible) easier to keep consistent if they
> don't have the added confusion of differing linguistics.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

That proves my point, if anything.  We've made it this far (200+ years)
without an official language for drafting laws in, operating our courts
in,
etc., yet somehow we still manage to get those things done.  I *really*
don't see how mandating an official language is going to add anything
positive to what seems to already just "work" (as much as our justice
system
actually works).

Jeff


_______________________________________________
GroveNet mailing list
GroveNet at rdrop.com
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet