[Grovenet] ear mark this!
David Morelli
jo.david at verizon.net
Wed Feb 13 21:28:03 PST 2008
On Feb 13, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Jeff Howden wrote:
> I call shenanigans. Your example is preposterous. We already have
> a *common* language that's the de facto for things of
> "importance". That same *common* language has worked quite well
> thus far for all the things you're suggesting we need an official
> language for. I fail to see what the need is to make it official.
>
> Jeff
There is a push to create a competitor for the role of "common
language". For example, at present, there are many jobs within our
school district that I cannot apply for because I don't speak the
competitor language, even though the job does not involve teaching
any language. The euphemism is "bilingual language skill" even
though it really means "speaks Spanish". Bilingual speakers of
Chinese, German, or Farsi need not apply. With one or two years of
English immersion, all children in the school systems should be
facile in English. If the children are future citizens, they will be
capable of benefiting from and contributing to this country. And if
they are the children of migrants, they can bring the United States
language and culture back to their homes.
The 200+ year history of English as the de facto standard is closely
tied to the 200+ year history of domination by male, white, Anglo-
Saxon government which spoke it's chosen language, and the adoption
by immigrants of the ruling power's language. We have made a shift,
starting in the 1960's from that paradigm. In those forty some years
we have determined that women and men from other groups have
something positive to offer the government of this nation. So, the
question that remains for me, "shall we remain one nation - the
United States - or shall we become a Confederation of states, each
with its own language and culture?"
When Americans moved into Texas and California and took land grants
they swore allegiance to the central government of Mexico. However,
they kept their English language and customs. Eventually they moved
to reconnect with their homeland by taking those areas from Mexico.
Would they have done so, if they truly considered themselves to be
"Mexicans"? I doubt it. I believe that, even though they were
living in Mexico, they never ceased to think of them selves as
"Americans".
Just because Spain got a two hundred year head start on stealing land
and enslaving people in the South West doesn't mean that we are
obligated to give those states to the government descended from the
Spanish colony of Mexico. I think we can learn from the lessons of
history. If we do not assimilate those who come into our
communities, our communities will change to become like the places
they left. That appears true for the future of Forest Grove vis-a-
vis our new residents, and true for the United States vis-a-vis our
new immigrants.
This would be design question, what future do you envision for the
United States? Shall we be an economic colony of the next super
power? Shall we be a "Balkanized" region? Shall we be an economic
backwater? Shall we use military power to enforce unity? Shall we
benefit from the thoughts of all of the citizens of this land?
There are many possible futures for our society. We will find some
response to peak oil, global warming, international terrorism,
limited resources, population pressures, etc. To that end, I would
like to enlist as many of our citizens as possible, especially the
next generation. I would like them to be part of this community, not
just *in* the community. The push to share English as the common
language may be viewed as a "European centric" attitude, and in some
cases it certainly is just that. But, Spanish is the language of the
Iberian peninsula and the Conquistadors, not the Americas. Spanish
is the language of European colonial domination of large tracts of
the Western Hemisphere. As such, it is no better, nor worse, as a
common tongue than English. English is simply the language that is
shared by the majority of the residents of this nation.
David
More information about the GroveNet
mailing list