[Grovenet] MACs for Christmas
Geri
g-g-steele at comcast.net
Thu Jan 3 13:22:51 PST 2008
Ron, yep, there are things I've liked about the use of both systems, which is I guess why I've used both. :)
Geri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <ron at cobi.biz>
To: "'Forest Grove local interests list'" <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] MACs for Christmas
> I'm not surprised Geri!
>
> That's the marketing tradeoff Apple made: simplicity, stability and more
> limited functions from a single supplier at Apple's price vs. IBM's greater
> range of options, and capabilities from a great many suppliers in a highly
> competitively priced marketplace.
>
> I remember when Mac users were very upset over Apple's lack of internet
> browsers about a decade ago when PC users were exploring the new cyberspace
> arena in large numbers. Apple took the criticism and refused to budge until
> they were completely ready.
>
> That's been their approach all along: stability and simplicity first. I'm
> not sure why they haven't won more market share over the years: perhaps
> because of the lower prices on PCs coming from a range of competitors.
>
> I've often wondered if Apple didn't "shoot themselves in the foot" fostering
> the cult status of their machine as the "Anti-IBM computer". It sure hasn't
> worked in the marketplace. The Mac is a good machine without trying to prove
> it by claiming the IBM PC is somehow flawed.
>
> It's significant to me that Apple gave huge numbers of computers to schools
> a back in the 80's. It helped launch a computer generation who, presumably,
> would grow up to buy Macs, but they didn't. When they pulled out their own
> pocketbooks they bought IBM PCs! I suspect they wanted the flexibility and
> the "leading edge of technology" of the PC over the simpler, more inherently
> stable but more costly Mac.
>
> After all, how many youngsters spending their own money would opt for a
> Lincoln Continental over a Ferrari, even if it's a temperamental Ferrari
> after they did a little customization?
>
> Maybe as they are getting older and are more dependent upon the PC as an
> essential tool a few are looking back at the Mac. Perhaps that has something
> to do with Apple's growing market share.
>
> Ron D'Eau Claire
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com] On
> Behalf Of Geri
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:01 PM
> To: Forest Grove local interests list
> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] MACs for Christmas
>
>
> Chuck, my 2-cents-worth:
>
> I have used both Mac & Windows for twelve years
> here at home. As a non-techie, which is what *most*
> folks are, I agree with you that Mac is w-a-y less
> trouble!
>
> Geri
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "chuck" <chuck at grovenet.net>
> To: <jeff at jeffhowden.com>; "Forest Grove local interests list"
> <grovenet at rdrop.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] MACs for Christmas
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> A truly trouble-free computer for the average non-technical computer
>>> user does not exist. All proponents of non-MS operating systems have
>>> been pushing this mantra constantly, but it's a logical fallacy.
>>>
>>>
>> In your opinion.
>>
>> My Linux machine is trouble free. My opinion.
>>
>> I'm sure David can say the same with his Mac, as could Jane, or any of
>> the other Mac users on this board.
>>
>> Trouble free - to me - means turning it on and having it actually come
>> on. Clicking my email icon and actually having it work. Surfing the
>> Internet with Firefox or Safari - and being able to go to any site
>> without threat of a dangerous popup, trojan horse, or virus. That's
>> pretty much sums up trouble free to me. A device that works like it is
>> supposed to. Like a TV, or radio.
>>
>> In my experience, Windows has never been trouble free. Freezing,
>> locking up, driver issues, viruses, spyware, drive-by trojans, blue
>> screens, support calls to foreign countries, activation issues, more
>> software to purchase. This is my definition of Windows. Not exactly
>> trouble free.
>>> An average non-technical user should not have to "learn an OS". They
>>> should be able to sit down at the machine and just get it to work.
>> I agree 100%.
>>>
>>>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>>> My other service call this vacation (its hard being a computer guy)
>>>> was to another relative whom I built a computer for 3 years ago.
>>>> Not one single Antivirus or Spyware application I had given him had
>>>> been updated. Not once. The computer was inundated with Viruses
>>>> and Spyware - big surprise. [...]
>>>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>>>
>>>
>>> User error.
>>>
>> Absolutely User Error.
>>
>> But 'should' it be his fault? Had he been using something other than
>> Windows - would it still have been an issue? I doubt it as most of his
>> problems were Virus/malware related.
>>
>> I still stand by my experience that Macs/Linux has far fewer Virus
>> problems than Windows.
>>
>> My Linux machine has been running 3 yrs. eMail, Internet, Word
>> Processing, music/mp3, video/dvd, photo editing/storage, cd/dvd
>> burning, web site editing. I have no firewall and no virus
>> protection. None.
>>
>> Should I worry? Maybe. But I don't. I may have viruses on here
>> right
>> now - Windows viruses - and without the proper privileges - they can do
>> absolutely nothing.
>>
>> I have purposely gone to hacking sites, warez sites, torrent sites,
>> myspace, etc....sites I know have trojans, and have even had the
>> Winfixer popups - I simply close them. I purposely open email
>> attachments - even questionable ones - nothing. I have tried to get a
>> virus. Sorry. They cannot do anything on an OS other than Windows.
>>
>> That may indeed change one day - but for now - I feel pretty safe.
>>
>>>
>>> Want a computer without the false sense of security (ie, the claims
>>> of being invulnerable)? Get a PC.
>>>
>>>
>> And when it breaks - I'm in the book.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GroveNet mailing list
>> GroveNet at rdrop.com http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
More information about the GroveNet
mailing list