[Grovenet] Meth/Policing/Apologies

[Steven]

My opinion stands for the time being. His reply was very canned. I note he
only responded to you because you agreed with the issues he already has
boiler plate aswers for.
I would like to see an end to being nice to meth heads. Just about everyone
was a 'snitch' for the police. They'd be arrested and let go to be a snitch.
They'd all rat on each other but nothing ever was done.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com]On
> Behalf Of Katie Allnutt
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:30 PM
> To: Forest Grove local interests list
> Subject: [Grovenet] Meth/Policing/Apologies
>
>
> No need to apologize to me because your post wasn't aimed at me. And
> nobody has to read any particular post.
> I was just trying to stick up for politicians. They get accused of
> all kinds of motives that really don't apply.
>
> Some politicians are warm and fuzzy people that are our friends and
> neighbors, maybe even relatives. Some are snakes in the grass, maybe
> even the relatives. It's important to judge them fairly to properly
> identify which is which.
>
>
> Katie  (keeping mum about which relatives I would never vote for!)
> PS. I don't have any relatives running for anything, whew!
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Steven wrote:
>
> > Sorry I missed your comments.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-
> >> bounces at rdrop.com]On
> >> Behalf Of Katie Allnutt
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:06 PM
> >> To: Forest Grove local interests list
> >> Subject: [Grovenet] Meth/Policing in the Grove
> >>
> >>
> >> Steven,
> >>    Since when does the whole paragraph on meth that I wrote, which
> >> Richard left in total in his reply, count as 'no one' commenting on
> >> meth.  You might be forgiven if you block my posts, but since you
> >> obviously read Richard's post and the original comment was included,
> >> you just missed the citizen input that prompted his response.
> >>    Richard may or may not be quite the politician but this criticism
> >> is totally unsupported by the facts.
> >>
> >> Katie
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Steven wrote:
> >>>
> >>> And a note for Richard. That post shows you're quite the
> >>> politician. No one
> >>> commented on the meth. So it appears that, like most politicians,
> >>> you'll do
> >>> what you want without regard for outside comment.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> GroveNet mailing list
> >> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> >> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > GroveNet mailing list
> > GroveNet at rdrop.com
> > http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>